|

20th May 2010
I’m afraid that I have to let you all know that Charlie is
in a bad way at the moment. Visitors that have not been
banned are saying that he has dark circles around his eyes
and that they have never seen him so stressed out. He’s now
on basics and I’ll let Charlie tell you what that means:
They’ve
put me on basics. I’m back to closed visits, only seeing
people through a thick glass window. I have to wear prison
clothes again and they’ve put me in a cell with no window.
It’s very damp and disheartening and all I have is a mouldy
mattress on the floor to sleep on. I’ve also been put on
basic pay of £4 per week, out of which I have to buy all my
own canteen, so there’s nothing left to make phone calls or
buy stamps to write to friends. I'm very tired and stressed
out by everything that they are doing to me.
They’ve been fucking around with my post for months now.
They’re slowly cutting me off from all my friends by
stopping their letters to me and stopping my letters to
them. People I usually write to must think that I’m ignoring
them, but it’s not true. I think my personal box must be
bulging by now with the letters they’ve not let me see. And
they’ve just taken so many of my friends off my visitors
list that there are very few left. Surely this is against
all my human rights?
I’d better tell you what happened the other week with the
dog. I was in the gym in my gym shorts when they told me
that they had banned my own brother, Mark, from visiting me
the next day and gave me a list of all the people that
weren’t allowed to visit me any more. I started banging and
smashing on the door, I was so shocked and angry. It seemed
like they were trying to bury me and every trace of me. Cut
me off from every one important to me. I was so angry and
took my anger out on a piece of gym equipment. That’s when
they sent the dog in.
There were twelve screws in riot gear outside the door. More
than enough to stop me, but the order was to send the dog in
to attack a 57 year old man dressed only in gym shorts. Why
did they do that? Why didn’t they just send in the riot
squad with their shields?
I can’t blame the prison officers for it. They didn’t want
to do it and they were absolutely disgusted at sending in
the Alsatian. One screw later told me that he had never seen
anything so inhuman in his thirty years in the service. They
were just obeying the orders from above!
I’m normally an animal lover, but what can you do when a
ferocious dog is biting you? I got it in a headlock to try
to protect myself. The dog soon backed off, but I was badly
bitten. Isn’t that excessive force to set a dog on a near
naked man who’s locked in a room with no escape? It surely
can’t be legal!
As I said in my last report to you all, the prison
authorities are trying to push Charlie into a reaction that
will bury him for years to come. Judging from the reports
coming out of HMP Woodhill, they are getting close to
succeeding unless they stop this inhumane treatment of a man
who just wants to be free at last.
I predict a riot!
One last thing I would like to point out: Has anyone
ever heard of an attack dog being used before in a British
prison to control a prisoner? In 2006 New York based
Human Rights Watch stated that they knew of no other
country outside of the USA (and only a few states there)
where such tactics are used and then only after ALL viable
options have been exhausted. This is a clear case of
inhumane treatment and possibly an illegal use of a prison
dog.
|